{"id":14,"date":"2013-03-10T00:56:31","date_gmt":"2013-03-10T00:56:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hlflegal.com\/?p=14"},"modified":"2023-03-18T00:56:43","modified_gmt":"2023-03-18T00:56:43","slug":"frito-lay-loses-patent-lawsuit-over-scoops","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hlflegal.com\/?p=14","title":{"rendered":"Frito-Lay Loses Patent Lawsuit Over Scoops"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n<p>A jury in Texas sided with the Defendant, Medallion Foods, Inc., stating that it&#8217;s &#8220;Bowlz&#8221; bowl-shaped tortilla chips did not infringe the intellectual property owned by the snack giant, Frito-Lay.<br \/><br \/>Frito-Lay filed a lawsuit against Medallion Foods, Inc. in February 2012, alleging that the Defendant&#8217;s Bowlz tortilla snack chips were too similar to Frito-Lay&#8217;s Tostitos Scoops! chips. Both of the chips are formed into a small bowl-shaped configuration to allow for easier scooping.<br \/><br \/>In addition to various trademark registrations, Frito-Lay owns a number of patents for the process of forming a tortilla chip into a bowl-shape configuration (U.S. Patent Nos. 6,610,344, 6,592,923, 6,638,553), as well as a U.S. design patent for the mold (U.S. Patent No. D459,853). In the end, the jury concluded that Medallion&#8217;s methods of making the Bowlz tortilla chips were sufficiently different than the methods described in Frito-Lay&#8217;s patents, and therefore Frito-Lay failed to prove that the Defendant infringed any of its intellectual property.<br \/><br \/>The original Complaint can be found here.<\/p>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A jury in Texas sided with the Defendant, Medallion Foods, Inc., stating that it&#8217;s &#8220;Bowlz&#8221; bowl-shaped tortilla chips did not infringe the intellectual property owned by the snack giant, Frito-Lay. Frito-Lay filed a lawsuit against Medallion Foods, Inc. in February 2012, alleging that the Defendant&#8217;s Bowlz tortilla snack chips were too similar to Frito-Lay&#8217;s Tostitos  [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"aioseo_notices":[],"featured_image_src":null,"featured_image_src_square":null,"author_info":{"display_name":"Benjamin M. Hanrahan","author_link":"https:\/\/hlflegal.com\/?author=1"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hlflegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hlflegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hlflegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hlflegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hlflegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hlflegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hlflegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hlflegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hlflegal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}